bound table

I am wondering if anyone knows a solution to this question.

I have an sp that may return two different value fields depending on the parameters that are passed in. One way, the sp can return 5 values and another way it can return 10 values. I need to bind the returned values to a table. However, I only want to view the values that are intended to be shown. For example, if the input is SSN and show all is false then the 5 values that need to be outputted would be first name, last name, address, zip code, and contact number. However, if the input is SSN and the show all is true, then the 10 values would be the name plus, other info........

How can I go about outputting all of this info? should I use one bound table?

Or should I have two tables one on top of another and then differentiate on what to show based on what parameters have been inputted? how would i do that and is it possible?

Column headers should reflect all the data that is displayed. Therefore, i was thinking making two tables with hard coded column headers.

Any help would be grateful!

thanks

yadgor2000

I found the answer to my own question, I hope it might help someone else in future: http://www.codeproject.com/dotnet/DynamicReport.asp?df=100&forumid=205933&exp=0&select=1195355

YADGOR2000

Bound SQL to IP address

Hi!
If there are a few NIC installed in server is it possible to make SQL Server
2000 listen only on specific IP address?
Regards
Silmar"Silmar" <silmar@.talex.pl> wrote in message
news:OuC0#kMCHHA.3448@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Hi!
> If there are a few NIC installed in server is it possible to make SQL
> Server 2000 listen only on specific IP address?
>
No. Only SQL 2005 can do this.
David

Bound SQL to IP address

Hi!
If there are a few NIC installed in server is it possible to make SQL Server
2000 listen only on specific IP address?
Regards
Silmar"Silmar" <silmar@.talex.pl> wrote in message
news:OuC0#kMCHHA.3448@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Hi!
> If there are a few NIC installed in server is it possible to make SQL
> Server 2000 listen only on specific IP address?
>
No. Only SQL 2005 can do this.
David

Bound control timing issues in Visual Basic

It is just me or...
I have two appications in very different environments that have
suddenly shown very similar behavior, after a fashion.
One application is simple desktop. I've been working on the development
off and on for a number of months. It uses controls bound to an Access
database. As a for instance, I have two list boxes where items are
copied from left to right and deleted from the left, a fairly standard
practice. After the delete from the left, the repaint should eliminate
the deleted item, which worked fine until just recently.
The client became very upset when the the control repainted with the
deleted item still displayed. And this was also happening with two grid
controls. It was making me quite nuts. I dug around until I found a
reference to 'sleep' and implemented it. The problem was resolved.
Therefore, the cursor in memory was not being overwritten in time to
keep up with the repaint.
I also have an application in a Citirx/Softricity environment that is
working just fine on several servers (it produces reports using the VB6
data report designer) but is failing on one. I have not yet seen the
results, but I've added the same 'Sleep' methodology to this
application. My current working assumption is that the application
(data report dll) does not have enough time to locate the remote
network printer in time to produce a display when requested by the
application. It's just a working assumption.
What I'm wondering is whether or not anyone else out there in VB land
particularly VB6 land has recently encountered any timing related
errors. I want to document this, if I'm not the only one encountering
the issues.
I'm bringing this up because of something I read around the time of the
emergency patch related to the possibility of viruses or trojans being
embbedded in graphic files. It suggested that the underlayment
(operating environment) was being adversly affected, that is it was
significantly slower to respond to certain requests, as a result of the
patch.
Thanks for your attention...Hello,
If you are using an Access database and you do not have a single
connection for the entire application, you may be running into this
issue:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q200300
Razvan

Bound Control on Access Form Causing High Memory Usage on SQL Server

I got about 50 Access users every day using the SQL Server
2000 database. At the end of the day, SQL Server always
ran out of the memory. Someone told me this is because of
the bound connection on the Access form causing the memory
leak. Is there a way to fix this problem without changing
my Access form design.not really.
acccess bound controls open numerous connections PER FORM.
this is not good.
only way to fix it would be to code your connectivity manually.
GAJ|||I currently have 2 GB physical memory which could last for
about 2 to 3 days if no one runs a big report. What if I
increase the memory size to 4 GB?

>--Original Message--
>not really.
>acccess bound controls open numerous connections PER FORM.
>this is not good.
>only way to fix it would be to code your connectivity
manually.
>
>GAJ
>
>.
>|||I suspect you will still eventually run out of connections and\or memory.
instead of using bound controls, write the code manually to populate
controls. that way you have explicit control over connection management.
will this work for you ?
GAJ|||Ken,
Are you sure it is really a memory leak? SQL Server will not release memory
once it grabs it unless the OS specifically calls for it. That is by
design. http://www.support.microsoft.com/?id=321363 Do you have things
other than sql server running on the same machine? If so you may want to
set your max memory setting to something less than the default of max and
see if that helps.
Andrew J. Kelly
SQL Server MVP
"Ken" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:bf6601c3ecfa$9f12e2a0$a401280a@.phx.gbl...
> I got about 50 Access users every day using the SQL Server
> 2000 database. At the end of the day, SQL Server always
> ran out of the memory. Someone told me this is because of
> the bound connection on the Access form causing the memory
> leak. Is there a way to fix this problem without changing
> my Access form design.

Bound Control on Access Form Causing High Memory Usage on SQL Server

I got about 50 Access users every day using the SQL Server
2000 database. At the end of the day, SQL Server always
ran out of the memory. Someone told me this is because of
the bound connection on the Access form causing the memory
leak. Is there a way to fix this problem without changing
my Access form design.not really.
acccess bound controls open numerous connections PER FORM.
this is not good.
only way to fix it would be to code your connectivity manually.
GAJ|||I currently have 2 GB physical memory which could last for
about 2 to 3 days if no one runs a big report. What if I
increase the memory size to 4 GB?
>--Original Message--
>not really.
>acccess bound controls open numerous connections PER FORM.
>this is not good.
>only way to fix it would be to code your connectivity
manually.
>
>GAJ
>
>.
>|||I suspect you will still eventually run out of connections and\or memory.
instead of using bound controls, write the code manually to populate
controls. that way you have explicit control over connection management.
will this work for you ?
GAJ|||Ken,
Are you sure it is really a memory leak? SQL Server will not release memory
once it grabs it unless the OS specifically calls for it. That is by
design. http://www.support.microsoft.com/?id=321363 Do you have things
other than sql server running on the same machine? If so you may want to
set your max memory setting to something less than the default of max and
see if that helps.
--
Andrew J. Kelly
SQL Server MVP
"Ken" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:bf6601c3ecfa$9f12e2a0$a401280a@.phx.gbl...
> I got about 50 Access users every day using the SQL Server
> 2000 database. At the end of the day, SQL Server always
> ran out of the memory. Someone told me this is because of
> the bound connection on the Access form causing the memory
> leak. Is there a way to fix this problem without changing
> my Access form design.